<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bondholder furious over GM bankruptcy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/01/bondholder-furious-over-gm-bankruptcy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/01/bondholder-furious-over-gm-bankruptcy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:26:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Weaseldog</title>
		<link>http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/01/bondholder-furious-over-gm-bankruptcy/comment-page-70/#comment-55876</link>
		<dc:creator>Weaseldog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/?p=3016#comment-55876</guid>
		<description>Barbara, I wouldn&#039;t count on it.

They knowingly committed a crime when they screwed the bondholders.

There is no reason to think they&#039;ll be tossing you any crumbs.

The politicians and bankers are following the same scripts we&#039;ve seen play out in Argentina and other nations.

Already many people are finding out that they can&#039;t withdraw their 401k funds. At some point the bankers will be stealing those outright. And say goodbye to pensions.

The problem is that too many people are going to retire at once. The sheer volume of withdrawals for retirements, will result in tremendous losses in the banking profits and in the markets.

Our politicians will let the banks simply seize those accounts, to keep them profitable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barbara, I wouldn&#039;t count on it.</p>
<p>They knowingly committed a crime when they screwed the bondholders.</p>
<p>There is no reason to think they&#039;ll be tossing you any crumbs.</p>
<p>The politicians and bankers are following the same scripts we&#039;ve seen play out in Argentina and other nations.</p>
<p>Already many people are finding out that they can&#039;t withdraw their 401k funds. At some point the bankers will be stealing those outright. And say goodbye to pensions.</p>
<p>The problem is that too many people are going to retire at once. The sheer volume of withdrawals for retirements, will result in tremendous losses in the banking profits and in the markets.</p>
<p>Our politicians will let the banks simply seize those accounts, to keep them profitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara</title>
		<link>http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/01/bondholder-furious-over-gm-bankruptcy/comment-page-70/#comment-55818</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/?p=3016#comment-55818</guid>
		<description>I also had gm bonds. and was told by my broker I would receive something for them So far it has been a year and I have received nothing. Does anyone know if there will be any thing being  given to bond holders</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also had gm bonds. and was told by my broker I would receive something for them So far it has been a year and I have received nothing. Does anyone know if there will be any thing being  given to bond holders</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Addison</title>
		<link>http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/01/bondholder-furious-over-gm-bankruptcy/comment-page-70/#comment-53184</link>
		<dc:creator>Addison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/?p=3016#comment-53184</guid>
		<description>Allbummedout.  Good reply and thanks.  I would like to think my ego is not that big, and I do not like to often promote myself in that fashion, but I was irritated with the constant comments about how stupid republicans are.   As I said they can&#039;t represent the half of America that is oppressed and uneducated and poor and then claim we are stupid.   As to Sarah Palin, I honestly have little opinion on her.  I do my best to resist the temptation of judging based on what the media presents about her.  I do not trust the media and if the media decides that they wish to demean you, they can and will.  I will wait and judge her on what I hear her say and if that is in conflict with her past.   I just hate inconsistencies, and thus if a person says one thing and does another without reasonable explanations, then I am at once skeptical of their ability to lead.   I do not accept the premise that experience in government is necessary to lead.  Obama is probably the least experienced person ever elected president, yet while I may not agree with him on most issues, there is no doubt in my mind he is an effective leader.    As to your last point about picking a political party, I think I made it quite clear that I have come to feel that lawyers are lawyers and looking out for themselves be they democrat or republican.  I joke each time congress gets us going on issues such as health care, or global warming, or bringing POW&#039;s from Gitmo, and look at each of how it screws the public and helps attorneys.  If you do that most often you will see the real motive behind them all.  Every move is calculated to allow maximum attorney time, such as providing attorneys to defend POW&#039;s, I call each bill &quot;another attorney full employment act&quot;.   Health care is not about us, but allowing more attorneys to sue, but now it will be tax payers footing the bills, Global warming and trading pollution credits, more attorneys get work.   And of course each time some democrat or replublican does something they have to hire some independent council to investigate..all of course at your and my expense.   

My politics are limited to what we should do to make us better and more efficient and competitive with the Germans, to the Chinese, and they look at it from the perspective of getting rich off the massess.  Until we change our thinking, we will die a slow death economically, with each downturn in the economy a bit worse than the last.   We see that now do we not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allbummedout.  Good reply and thanks.  I would like to think my ego is not that big, and I do not like to often promote myself in that fashion, but I was irritated with the constant comments about how stupid republicans are.   As I said they can&#039;t represent the half of America that is oppressed and uneducated and poor and then claim we are stupid.   As to Sarah Palin, I honestly have little opinion on her.  I do my best to resist the temptation of judging based on what the media presents about her.  I do not trust the media and if the media decides that they wish to demean you, they can and will.  I will wait and judge her on what I hear her say and if that is in conflict with her past.   I just hate inconsistencies, and thus if a person says one thing and does another without reasonable explanations, then I am at once skeptical of their ability to lead.   I do not accept the premise that experience in government is necessary to lead.  Obama is probably the least experienced person ever elected president, yet while I may not agree with him on most issues, there is no doubt in my mind he is an effective leader.    As to your last point about picking a political party, I think I made it quite clear that I have come to feel that lawyers are lawyers and looking out for themselves be they democrat or republican.  I joke each time congress gets us going on issues such as health care, or global warming, or bringing POW&#039;s from Gitmo, and look at each of how it screws the public and helps attorneys.  If you do that most often you will see the real motive behind them all.  Every move is calculated to allow maximum attorney time, such as providing attorneys to defend POW&#039;s, I call each bill &#034;another attorney full employment act&#034;.   Health care is not about us, but allowing more attorneys to sue, but now it will be tax payers footing the bills, Global warming and trading pollution credits, more attorneys get work.   And of course each time some democrat or replublican does something they have to hire some independent council to investigate..all of course at your and my expense.   </p>
<p>My politics are limited to what we should do to make us better and more efficient and competitive with the Germans, to the Chinese, and they look at it from the perspective of getting rich off the massess.  Until we change our thinking, we will die a slow death economically, with each downturn in the economy a bit worse than the last.   We see that now do we not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/01/bondholder-furious-over-gm-bankruptcy/comment-page-70/#comment-53123</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 13:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/?p=3016#comment-53123</guid>
		<description>Addison,

You are correct.  I wanted to keep it short and understandable.

Most importantly, we forgot we needed each other,(democrats and republicans) workers needed a job, and business needed workers.  Workers thought they were irreplacable.  They found out the hard way, they were replaceable, unfortunately, many other businesses and workders also suffered as the cornerstones to communities relocated to other countries, support businesses folded and more jobs were lost. 
Let me make this clear, I am the grand daughter of  immigrents.  They came, they learned the ENGLISH language, they worked hard, they became educated, the lessons that were passed along to me were profound.  One of which is &#039;Don&#039;t cut your nose off to spite your face&#039;, if only more people had learned that lesson.
For any of you who have your doubts as to what you can accomplish, I would suggest you get ahold of a series of tapes and books by Nedo Queban.  He was an immigrent who came to America at 17, not knowing any English, but with a burning desire to learn.  The story is all inspiring, and can be the key to unlock our potential as human beings, no matter what our background.  No matter.  Yesterday is gone, tomorrow is not here yet, but today, today we can choose to make a difference in our lives and those around us, by simply putting jealousy aside, and start with me.  When I improve me, then we can do many great things together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Addison,</p>
<p>You are correct.  I wanted to keep it short and understandable.</p>
<p>Most importantly, we forgot we needed each other,(democrats and republicans) workers needed a job, and business needed workers.  Workers thought they were irreplacable.  They found out the hard way, they were replaceable, unfortunately, many other businesses and workders also suffered as the cornerstones to communities relocated to other countries, support businesses folded and more jobs were lost.<br />
Let me make this clear, I am the grand daughter of  immigrents.  They came, they learned the ENGLISH language, they worked hard, they became educated, the lessons that were passed along to me were profound.  One of which is &#039;Don&#039;t cut your nose off to spite your face&#039;, if only more people had learned that lesson.<br />
For any of you who have your doubts as to what you can accomplish, I would suggest you get ahold of a series of tapes and books by Nedo Queban.  He was an immigrent who came to America at 17, not knowing any English, but with a burning desire to learn.  The story is all inspiring, and can be the key to unlock our potential as human beings, no matter what our background.  No matter.  Yesterday is gone, tomorrow is not here yet, but today, today we can choose to make a difference in our lives and those around us, by simply putting jealousy aside, and start with me.  When I improve me, then we can do many great things together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allbummedout</title>
		<link>http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/01/bondholder-furious-over-gm-bankruptcy/comment-page-70/#comment-53089</link>
		<dc:creator>allbummedout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 06:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/?p=3016#comment-53089</guid>
		<description>Addison: I agree with everything you said to my chagrin, particularly because your ego is likely the size of your net worth. I digress; to each his own. What I would like to ask someone with degrees in Nuclear Physics and engineering (to give you the benefit of doubt) is this: explain Sarah Palin. Is she Bush&#039;s &quot;mini me&quot; (like the little dumb twerp on Austin Powers)? Seriously, her stupidity is mortifying, although I&#039;d be stupid any day of the week for the money she is raking in! You said in the beginning of your right-on rant &quot;the democrats are just about equal with republicans&quot; and so I&#039;m supposing your statistics about Democrats and Republicans is supposed to be considered as credible given your impressive almost aristocratic education and credentials. That is why in the spirit of free speech, sticking my head out of the foxhole to risk getting it blown off, I challenge those statistics as meaningful. My sister and brother in-law are academics who graduated with Ph.D.s from Stanford, and he heads a science department of a major university; both have tenure and will make their full salaries for life on retirement. (Their salaries are in the comfortable six-figures.) They live in a wealthy enclave and travel the world several times a year (to conferences, grant paid field trips or whatever you call it, and so on). I&#039;m just your little unimpressive college grad with a bachelor degree from an unimpressive university, not the sharpest tool in the shed so to speak compared to the honor students (although I was an honor student in high school, hehe, with straight A&#039;s in math including calculus, as I digress again). My point of this little rant is to say my sister and brother in-law are (horrors!) Democrats, and voted for Obama. And me? I was a diehard Republican for most of my life until my sister talked me into voting for Obama. I guess my disputable point is that those impressive statistics are meaningless in the real world, IMO, although I perversely agree with your post in literal content! It&#039;s late so instead of picking apart my delivery, I&#039;m curious to hear (unless you figure it&#039;s a waste of time to lower yourself to someone at my academic level) if you really believe those statistics mean anything from a practical standpoint? Isn&#039;t picking a political party really pointless, where you could throw a dart at a dart board labeled &quot;Democrat&quot; or &quot;Republican&quot; to decide? We were up a creek with George W. Bush (whose dad Bush Sr. I voted for and still believe did an excellent job given the circumstances) and we&#039;re up a creek with Obama... but we would have been even more up a creek with John McCain. If that old geezer kicked the bucket after getting elected, we would have been really, and I mean REALLY up a creek! I mean, Palin is such a bad girl they ought to cast her in an Austin Powers sequel!! (I use the phrase up a creek instead of a more graphic word, to avoid getting censored.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Addison: I agree with everything you said to my chagrin, particularly because your ego is likely the size of your net worth. I digress; to each his own. What I would like to ask someone with degrees in Nuclear Physics and engineering (to give you the benefit of doubt) is this: explain Sarah Palin. Is she Bush&#039;s &#034;mini me&#034; (like the little dumb twerp on Austin Powers)? Seriously, her stupidity is mortifying, although I&#039;d be stupid any day of the week for the money she is raking in! You said in the beginning of your right-on rant &#034;the democrats are just about equal with republicans&#034; and so I&#039;m supposing your statistics about Democrats and Republicans is supposed to be considered as credible given your impressive almost aristocratic education and credentials. That is why in the spirit of free speech, sticking my head out of the foxhole to risk getting it blown off, I challenge those statistics as meaningful. My sister and brother in-law are academics who graduated with Ph.D.s from Stanford, and he heads a science department of a major university; both have tenure and will make their full salaries for life on retirement. (Their salaries are in the comfortable six-figures.) They live in a wealthy enclave and travel the world several times a year (to conferences, grant paid field trips or whatever you call it, and so on). I&#039;m just your little unimpressive college grad with a bachelor degree from an unimpressive university, not the sharpest tool in the shed so to speak compared to the honor students (although I was an honor student in high school, hehe, with straight A&#039;s in math including calculus, as I digress again). My point of this little rant is to say my sister and brother in-law are (horrors!) Democrats, and voted for Obama. And me? I was a diehard Republican for most of my life until my sister talked me into voting for Obama. I guess my disputable point is that those impressive statistics are meaningless in the real world, IMO, although I perversely agree with your post in literal content! It&#039;s late so instead of picking apart my delivery, I&#039;m curious to hear (unless you figure it&#039;s a waste of time to lower yourself to someone at my academic level) if you really believe those statistics mean anything from a practical standpoint? Isn&#039;t picking a political party really pointless, where you could throw a dart at a dart board labeled &#034;Democrat&#034; or &#034;Republican&#034; to decide? We were up a creek with George W. Bush (whose dad Bush Sr. I voted for and still believe did an excellent job given the circumstances) and we&#039;re up a creek with Obama... but we would have been even more up a creek with John McCain. If that old geezer kicked the bucket after getting elected, we would have been really, and I mean REALLY up a creek! I mean, Palin is such a bad girl they ought to cast her in an Austin Powers sequel!! (I use the phrase up a creek instead of a more graphic word, to avoid getting censored.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Addison</title>
		<link>http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/01/bondholder-furious-over-gm-bankruptcy/comment-page-70/#comment-52974</link>
		<dc:creator>Addison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/?p=3016#comment-52974</guid>
		<description>JB in SanFrancisco,

I find your type amusing.  Since the democrats are just about equal with republicans, and democrats represent the poor and oppressed, unions, and immigrants who now have the right to vote, and those on welfare and minorities, in particular hispanic and black, and republicans represent the wealthy, business, white collar workers, white middle america correct?  Then I think we can break that down into the fact that statistically (according to) that blacks make up 12 percent of the population, vote about 93% democrat, make up 67% of all highschool dropouts, and hispanic are close behind, that labor and blue collar workers are typically labor not educated beyond high school, and immigrants are also not educated either, I think then we can conclude other than a few snob intellectuals the democratic part is NOT the party of the educated.  Obviously white collar, business and weathy are more likely to have higher education.   So who are the so called liberal intellectuals?  Probably some degree in political science, or psychology or history or some education that only requires time and money and not much intelligence.  My degrees are in both Nuclear Physics and engineering and dude I am a republican.  If you wish to compare intelligence I will gladly take you on.   This year alone I have been to Moscow, St Petersburg, Novosibersk, Fukuoka, Toyko, Nagasaki, Kiev, and a number of other cities.  I also know history quite well, and geography as well.   Whatever your degree is in, I could easily get it if I so chose to do so, but willing to bet a sizeable sum you could not reciprocate.    You liberal dems constantly attack republicans as being stupid, yet your part is largely made up of the least educated, and most easily manipulated people.  You attack republicans for their power and greed, yet say we are stupid?  How can you get power (eg money) and be stupid?   Can&#039;t have it both ways.   We are all waiting to hear what your degree is in.  I have a feeling I have already come close.   Intellectually you do not even stand on the podium with me and never will.  Look at a map of the world and wonder why we, our tiny bit of land became so wealthy once and so powerful?  Why?  And then ask yourself if those values that got us to that level are still strong in America today.  Even you have to intelligence to know the truth to that question.   Mary was on the most part correct, although a bit simple in her explanation.   We are a country living off the backs of our ancestors, and that will last only so long.  The values that made us strong are now making China strong.  Obama asked them what they are doing right?  The answer is just about everything the opposite of what Obama wishes to do.  And I do not blame Obama, Bush was not a lot better.  As long as we keep electing Attorneys to run things we will decline.   Does not matter which party.  We need liberals and conservatives who have accomplished things in their lives, who actually know how important it is to build wealth.   I think what Mary was trying to say, was that we have pushed a huge percentage of wealth building jobs overseas, and I think anyone can figure out if you keep spending more than you make, that leads to trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JB in SanFrancisco,</p>
<p>I find your type amusing.  Since the democrats are just about equal with republicans, and democrats represent the poor and oppressed, unions, and immigrants who now have the right to vote, and those on welfare and minorities, in particular hispanic and black, and republicans represent the wealthy, business, white collar workers, white middle america correct?  Then I think we can break that down into the fact that statistically (according to) that blacks make up 12 percent of the population, vote about 93% democrat, make up 67% of all highschool dropouts, and hispanic are close behind, that labor and blue collar workers are typically labor not educated beyond high school, and immigrants are also not educated either, I think then we can conclude other than a few snob intellectuals the democratic part is NOT the party of the educated.  Obviously white collar, business and weathy are more likely to have higher education.   So who are the so called liberal intellectuals?  Probably some degree in political science, or psychology or history or some education that only requires time and money and not much intelligence.  My degrees are in both Nuclear Physics and engineering and dude I am a republican.  If you wish to compare intelligence I will gladly take you on.   This year alone I have been to Moscow, St Petersburg, Novosibersk, Fukuoka, Toyko, Nagasaki, Kiev, and a number of other cities.  I also know history quite well, and geography as well.   Whatever your degree is in, I could easily get it if I so chose to do so, but willing to bet a sizeable sum you could not reciprocate.    You liberal dems constantly attack republicans as being stupid, yet your part is largely made up of the least educated, and most easily manipulated people.  You attack republicans for their power and greed, yet say we are stupid?  How can you get power (eg money) and be stupid?   Can&#039;t have it both ways.   We are all waiting to hear what your degree is in.  I have a feeling I have already come close.   Intellectually you do not even stand on the podium with me and never will.  Look at a map of the world and wonder why we, our tiny bit of land became so wealthy once and so powerful?  Why?  And then ask yourself if those values that got us to that level are still strong in America today.  Even you have to intelligence to know the truth to that question.   Mary was on the most part correct, although a bit simple in her explanation.   We are a country living off the backs of our ancestors, and that will last only so long.  The values that made us strong are now making China strong.  Obama asked them what they are doing right?  The answer is just about everything the opposite of what Obama wishes to do.  And I do not blame Obama, Bush was not a lot better.  As long as we keep electing Attorneys to run things we will decline.   Does not matter which party.  We need liberals and conservatives who have accomplished things in their lives, who actually know how important it is to build wealth.   I think what Mary was trying to say, was that we have pushed a huge percentage of wealth building jobs overseas, and I think anyone can figure out if you keep spending more than you make, that leads to trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/01/bondholder-furious-over-gm-bankruptcy/comment-page-70/#comment-52838</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/?p=3016#comment-52838</guid>
		<description>Digging at each other, will accomplish nothing.  I&#039;m referring to the comments &#039;Because you are as uniformed as most Republicans&#039; and Repulican&#039;s adore ignorance&#039;.

Democrats and Republicans forgot they needed each other, and with comments like those above, it is evident.

Getting past that.  Traditionally, Republicans were more conservative, and yes, capitalistic.  Democrats were more liberal, anti-capitalistic  and unionized --- purporting to be in &#039;support&#039; of the labor class.

But let&#039;s look to see what&#039;s happened.  Unions pushed too far, demanded excess for little effort.  Allowed workers to be high and drunk and asleep, and yet have union representation and &#039;a paycheck&#039;.
Democrats forgot they need capitalists to invest in business so that thier &#039;workers&#039; would have jobs.

Republicans, being capitalists, got tired of paying for sub standard work, and bickering, and found new ground to invest in --- out of the country.

So now what?  I think a start is to stop calling names and insinuating such nonsence.  

Don&#039;t get mad.  Get even.  How?  Become a better employee instead of a bitter employee. Buy American made, support yourself, your neighbor, your friend, your family member whose job depends on it.  

Remember, Bill Clinton signed NAFTA, which has gutted our country of jobs.... why? Because nearly everything can be made cheaper (not necessarily better) in third world countries where slavery (sorry .25 and .50 and hour is slavery) is acceptable.  What&#039;s amazing though, is the worker&#039;s attitude of gratitude for a job, which has been lacking in our country for decades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digging at each other, will accomplish nothing.  I&#039;m referring to the comments &#039;Because you are as uniformed as most Republicans&#039; and Repulican&#039;s adore ignorance&#039;.</p>
<p>Democrats and Republicans forgot they needed each other, and with comments like those above, it is evident.</p>
<p>Getting past that.  Traditionally, Republicans were more conservative, and yes, capitalistic.  Democrats were more liberal, anti-capitalistic  and unionized - purporting to be in &#039;support&#039; of the labor class.</p>
<p>But let&#039;s look to see what&#039;s happened.  Unions pushed too far, demanded excess for little effort.  Allowed workers to be high and drunk and asleep, and yet have union representation and &#039;a paycheck&#039;.<br />
Democrats forgot they need capitalists to invest in business so that thier &#039;workers&#039; would have jobs.</p>
<p>Republicans, being capitalists, got tired of paying for sub standard work, and bickering, and found new ground to invest in - out of the country.</p>
<p>So now what?  I think a start is to stop calling names and insinuating such nonsence.  </p>
<p>Don&#039;t get mad.  Get even.  How?  Become a better employee instead of a bitter employee. Buy American made, support yourself, your neighbor, your friend, your family member whose job depends on it.  </p>
<p>Remember, Bill Clinton signed NAFTA, which has gutted our country of jobs.... why? Because nearly everything can be made cheaper (not necessarily better) in third world countries where slavery (sorry .25 and .50 and hour is slavery) is acceptable.  What&#039;s amazing though, is the worker&#039;s attitude of gratitude for a job, which has been lacking in our country for decades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jB san francisco</title>
		<link>http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/01/bondholder-furious-over-gm-bankruptcy/comment-page-70/#comment-52706</link>
		<dc:creator>jB san francisco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/?p=3016#comment-52706</guid>
		<description>In fact in Europe more territory was won by the Russians which is why they dominated the Eastern lands and east Germany. We won against the Germans in Western Europe. Though strategic bombing and factory output from the US was critical...and that great liberal program &quot;Lend/Lease&quot; which Republicans opposed was the centerpiece of both victories. Most Republican opposed fighting Germany at all until Pearl Harbor.

Many Nazi were allowed to escape by the Allies because they were considered assets to fight the Soviets in the next war.

Because you are as uniformed as most Republicans, you probably didn&#039;t know the Berlin Wall wasn&#039;t built until the 60s.

Again, some reading would help you know that McArthur specifically left Hirohito in place because by showing dominance over the emperor the psychological power to control the population was more easily established. That is why the emperor was compelled to speak over the radio for the first time to tell the Japanese they were defeated.

Funny that you thought I meant Bush Jr when I wrote &quot;pretended to be elected president and his family are all crooks.&quot; that may be true, but I was referring to Karzai and his brother. 

Republican&#039;s adore ignorance. Sarah Palin, Bush Jr, Hannity...
...after Buckley died you guys sure are lacking intellectual heft, and obviously prefer invective and bluster.

You still haven&#039;t answered &quot;what does a victory look like in Afghanistan?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact in Europe more territory was won by the Russians which is why they dominated the Eastern lands and east Germany. We won against the Germans in Western Europe. Though strategic bombing and factory output from the US was critical...and that great liberal program &#034;Lend/Lease&#034; which Republicans opposed was the centerpiece of both victories. Most Republican opposed fighting Germany at all until Pearl Harbor.</p>
<p>Many Nazi were allowed to escape by the Allies because they were considered assets to fight the Soviets in the next war.</p>
<p>Because you are as uniformed as most Republicans, you probably didn&#039;t know the Berlin Wall wasn&#039;t built until the 60s.</p>
<p>Again, some reading would help you know that McArthur specifically left Hirohito in place because by showing dominance over the emperor the psychological power to control the population was more easily established. That is why the emperor was compelled to speak over the radio for the first time to tell the Japanese they were defeated.</p>
<p>Funny that you thought I meant Bush Jr when I wrote &#034;pretended to be elected president and his family are all crooks.&#034; that may be true, but I was referring to Karzai and his brother. </p>
<p>Republican&#039;s adore ignorance. Sarah Palin, Bush Jr, Hannity...<br />
...after Buckley died you guys sure are lacking intellectual heft, and obviously prefer invective and bluster.</p>
<p>You still haven&#039;t answered &#034;what does a victory look like in Afghanistan?&#034;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Addison</title>
		<link>http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/01/bondholder-furious-over-gm-bankruptcy/comment-page-70/#comment-52687</link>
		<dc:creator>Addison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/?p=3016#comment-52687</guid>
		<description>JB..by your twisted logic.. we did not win  in WW2 against Germany because Berlin was divided and walled in and the other countries around germany were dominated by the russians, and some Nazi&#039;s escaped to other countries etc etc etc.. and we did not defeat the Japanese because most Japanese still believed the emperor was a God, and some Japanese still continued to fight.. right?   And of course you had to say the guy who pretended to be elected?  Really?  I would love to debate you in person.. I would rip your liberal ignorant ass with logic that would just shut that pansey mouth of yours permanently</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JB..by your twisted logic.. we did not win  in WW2 against Germany because Berlin was divided and walled in and the other countries around germany were dominated by the russians, and some Nazi&#039;s escaped to other countries etc etc etc.. and we did not defeat the Japanese because most Japanese still believed the emperor was a God, and some Japanese still continued to fight.. right?   And of course you had to say the guy who pretended to be elected?  Really?  I would love to debate you in person.. I would rip your liberal ignorant ass with logic that would just shut that pansey mouth of yours permanently</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jB san francisco</title>
		<link>http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/01/bondholder-furious-over-gm-bankruptcy/comment-page-69/#comment-52648</link>
		<dc:creator>jB san francisco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/?p=3016#comment-52648</guid>
		<description>Mandalore

The United States lost the war in Iraq twice.
Round One:
The first time is when the US returned control of Kuwait to the degenerate royal family and left Saddam in power, leaving his helicopters and mechanized divisions to kill massive amounts of the Shia population in the south and Kurds in the north, all while continuing his reign of torture.

Round two:
Bush Jr. unleashes the chaos that has been let loose currently. Nothing has been won or solved. Saddam is gone, but he had was ready to leave in 1991 except Bush the elder didn&#039;t want him deposed. He was the considered the strategic cork on Iran.
The clear winner in Iraq is Iran and oil companies in other countries that has just inked oil deals with the Iraqi and Kurdish governments.

In Afghanistan, the Taliban is not a foreign force, they are a political party of sorts with a vast following. You&#039;d have to kill 1/3 of the country in order to &quot;win.&quot; And the guy who pretended to be elected president and his family are all crooks. What&#039;s does victory look like? 

You must be doing your research by watching Glenn Beck.

The financial issue is that every cent of these ill conceived wars have been paid for with money borrowed from China, money they have because we have exported our industry to increase the margins for companies like WalMart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mandalore</p>
<p>The United States lost the war in Iraq twice.<br />
Round One:<br />
The first time is when the US returned control of Kuwait to the degenerate royal family and left Saddam in power, leaving his helicopters and mechanized divisions to kill massive amounts of the Shia population in the south and Kurds in the north, all while continuing his reign of torture.</p>
<p>Round two:<br />
Bush Jr. unleashes the chaos that has been let loose currently. Nothing has been won or solved. Saddam is gone, but he had was ready to leave in 1991 except Bush the elder didn&#039;t want him deposed. He was the considered the strategic cork on Iran.<br />
The clear winner in Iraq is Iran and oil companies in other countries that has just inked oil deals with the Iraqi and Kurdish governments.</p>
<p>In Afghanistan, the Taliban is not a foreign force, they are a political party of sorts with a vast following. You&#039;d have to kill 1/3 of the country in order to &#034;win.&#034; And the guy who pretended to be elected president and his family are all crooks. What&#039;s does victory look like? </p>
<p>You must be doing your research by watching Glenn Beck.</p>
<p>The financial issue is that every cent of these ill conceived wars have been paid for with money borrowed from China, money they have because we have exported our industry to increase the margins for companies like WalMart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mandalore</title>
		<link>http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/01/bondholder-furious-over-gm-bankruptcy/comment-page-69/#comment-52604</link>
		<dc:creator>Mandalore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/?p=3016#comment-52604</guid>
		<description>JB,

I am calling you out - why do you even bring up the two wars?  You are trying to redirect because you have nothing else constrcutive to say.

Also, dolt, we won the iraq war, it is being transitioned to the iraqis now. - we would also win the war against the taliban if the president put half as much effort into the war campaign as he does thinking up ways to dig us deeper into dept with wasteful domestic policies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JB,</p>
<p>I am calling you out &#8211; why do you even bring up the two wars?  You are trying to redirect because you have nothing else constrcutive to say.</p>
<p>Also, dolt, we won the iraq war, it is being transitioned to the iraqis now. &#8211; we would also win the war against the taliban if the president put half as much effort into the war campaign as he does thinking up ways to dig us deeper into dept with wasteful domestic policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jB san francisco</title>
		<link>http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/01/bondholder-furious-over-gm-bankruptcy/comment-page-69/#comment-52597</link>
		<dc:creator>jB san francisco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/?p=3016#comment-52597</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not NAFTA that is the problem. It was the change in China trade policy. Mexico has not accumulated a giant trade surplus and using that surplus to loan us money for the two unconstitutional wars we are fighting and losing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s not NAFTA that is the problem. It was the change in China trade policy. Mexico has not accumulated a giant trade surplus and using that surplus to loan us money for the two unconstitutional wars we are fighting and losing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weaseldog</title>
		<link>http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/01/bondholder-furious-over-gm-bankruptcy/comment-page-69/#comment-52593</link>
		<dc:creator>Weaseldog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/?p=3016#comment-52593</guid>
		<description>Gambling in the stock market is not investing.

Yes, companies raise cash by selling stock, but as that stock is traded over and over, the company no longer makes money on the trades.

After that initial sale, speculators place bets as to whether the stock price will rise or fall.

When more money is going in than going out, the price rises. When more money is going out than going in, the price drops.

This is the reason the government is funneling a river of the taxpayers money through GS into the markets. Only a continuous flow of exponentially increase debt can keep this bubble going. the taxpayers are losing their jobs fast, and with that the funds that used to prop up pensions and 401ks.

Only rapidly expanding debt can keep the market from imploding now. America will have to be hollowed out to nothing , to save the markets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gambling in the stock market is not investing.</p>
<p>Yes, companies raise cash by selling stock, but as that stock is traded over and over, the company no longer makes money on the trades.</p>
<p>After that initial sale, speculators place bets as to whether the stock price will rise or fall.</p>
<p>When more money is going in than going out, the price rises. When more money is going out than going in, the price drops.</p>
<p>This is the reason the government is funneling a river of the taxpayers money through GS into the markets. Only a continuous flow of exponentially increase debt can keep this bubble going. the taxpayers are losing their jobs fast, and with that the funds that used to prop up pensions and 401ks.</p>
<p>Only rapidly expanding debt can keep the market from imploding now. America will have to be hollowed out to nothing , to save the markets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/01/bondholder-furious-over-gm-bankruptcy/comment-page-69/#comment-52584</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/?p=3016#comment-52584</guid>
		<description>You know, sometimes I really wonder about those who post comments.  The grammar leaves much to be desired so it makes me wonder how and why they even wish to comment.  Do they truly understand the rules of investment? I think not. As this depression worsens, and it will, there will be plenty of time for all those who post, to take some classes in English, so that when they go to apply for the next job, they will be hirable.
In the meantime, everyone should be thank-ful for those who do invest, without those investments, there are no jobs.  See what&#039;s been happening?  With NAFTA the investments went to other countries, where supposedly those people are willing to work and not fight with their boss every day....... the lessons we still have to learn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, sometimes I really wonder about those who post comments.  The grammar leaves much to be desired so it makes me wonder how and why they even wish to comment.  Do they truly understand the rules of investment? I think not. As this depression worsens, and it will, there will be plenty of time for all those who post, to take some classes in English, so that when they go to apply for the next job, they will be hirable.<br />
In the meantime, everyone should be thank-ful for those who do invest, without those investments, there are no jobs.  See what&#039;s been happening?  With NAFTA the investments went to other countries, where supposedly those people are willing to work and not fight with their boss every day....... the lessons we still have to learn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Whelan</title>
		<link>http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/01/bondholder-furious-over-gm-bankruptcy/comment-page-69/#comment-52569</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Whelan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/?p=3016#comment-52569</guid>
		<description>A huge number of those who have responded to Debra&#039;s plight do not understand the system in the slightest.   Time and again writers referred to &quot;investing in the stock market&quot; and &quot;boo-hooed&quot; her.  She invested in BONDS, not stocks.  People invest in BONDS for several reasons, one of them being that it is agreed upon upfront that in a bankruptcy, the bondholders are paid off first for their investment in the company.  Those are the rules.  It&#039;s not a &quot;boo hoo&quot; situation.  It&#039;s not a &quot;hey, I lost money in the stock market too, diversify next time Debra&quot;.  It’s the rules of investment.  Bondholders are paid off first.  But Obama shafted bondholders, who made their investment decisions years ago, by handing over the GM&#039;s assets to the unions.  &quot;Bate and switch&quot; is not an acceptable investment policy and all you writers who don&#039;t understand this had better be ware of your own investments and 401k decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A huge number of those who have responded to Debra&#039;s plight do not understand the system in the slightest.   Time and again writers referred to &#034;investing in the stock market&#034; and &#034;boo-hooed&#034; her.  She invested in BONDS, not stocks.  People invest in BONDS for several reasons, one of them being that it is agreed upon upfront that in a bankruptcy, the bondholders are paid off first for their investment in the company.  Those are the rules.  It&#039;s not a &#034;boo hoo&#034; situation.  It&#039;s not a &#034;hey, I lost money in the stock market too, diversify next time Debra&#034;.  It’s the rules of investment.  Bondholders are paid off first.  But Obama shafted bondholders, who made their investment decisions years ago, by handing over the GM&#039;s assets to the unions.  &#034;Bate and switch&#034; is not an acceptable investment policy and all you writers who don&#039;t understand this had better be ware of your own investments and 401k decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
